May 03 2007
There’s no WMD’s
I repeat ladies and gents: Iraqi is devoid of any WMD’s whatsoever. Bush lied, people died. If he didn’t lie, where’s the WMD’s?
27 killed in Ramadi chemical attack
Ramadi: A suicide bomber targeting a police station exploded his truck full of chlorine gas in a residential area yesterday, killing 27 people in the biggest chemical attack by insurgents in Iraq since the invasion.
Amid the continuing violence, Prime Minister Nouri Al Maliki ordered that jobs and pensions be offered to former officers of executed president Saddam Hussain’s military, many of whom had joined the Sunni insurgency against US forces.
The chemical attack took place in the western city of Ramadi. First reports said that 20 people had been killed, but the toll was later amended by police.
Um… Okay, so there WERE WMD’s…
Have you looked in Syria?
Heck, the WMD’s are there. I was just being ironic. This is just one instance of, what, two dozen chemical attacks against our troops? Chemical weapons are WMD’s.
But only if it’s mustard gas right?
Or do the democrats need to see it up close and personal first? Of course that means that they’d have to get off their duffs and go to Iraq…
Thom, the beliefs of the Left are WMDs. They don’t want to outlaw WMDs.